How did the Democratic party become hostage to atheists and anti-Christian bigots?
Q. The Democratic party used to be home to the vast majority of Catholic voters. 2004 was the first time that a Republican (Bush), against Kerry (nominal Catholic) got the majority of the Catholic vote. Atheists and anti-Christian bigots now dominate the Democratic Party. They say they aren't religous but public schools are their temples used to indoctrinate children via their secularist, anti-Christian views. America has had a long Judeo-Christian tradition. What is the cause of the big backlash against it? Why is the Democratic party willing to lose Christian voters like it has in the last 30 years, especially of late? How did the Democratic party become hostage to atheists and anti-Christian bigots?
Asked by Charles Martel - Thu Sep 28 16:22:18 2006 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
A. How did the Republican party become the home of Bible Nazis? bible nazi - A fundamentalist christian who thinks it is a violation of their rights if they are denied the opportunity to use the coercive power of the state to shove their god down my throat
Answered by iknowtruthismine - Thu Sep 28 16:32:26 2006
Q. The Democratic party used to be home to the vast majority of Catholic voters. 2004 was the first time that a Republican (Bush), against Kerry (nominal Catholic) got the majority of the Catholic vote. Atheists and anti-Christian bigots now dominate the Democratic Party. They say they aren't religous but public schools are their temples used to indoctrinate children via their secularist, anti-Christian views. America has had a long Judeo-Christian tradition. What is the cause of the big backlash against it? Why is the Democratic party willing to lose Christian voters like it has in the last 30 years, especially of late? How did the Democratic party become hostage to atheists and anti-Christian bigots?
Asked by Charles Martel - Thu Sep 28 16:22:18 2006 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
A. How did the Republican party become the home of Bible Nazis? bible nazi - A fundamentalist christian who thinks it is a violation of their rights if they are denied the opportunity to use the coercive power of the state to shove their god down my throat
Answered by iknowtruthismine - Thu Sep 28 16:32:26 2006
How did the democratic party influence the election of 1828?
Q. I need to know how the democratic party affected the election of 1828 (Andrew Jackson).
Asked by funkykitty116 - Sun Apr 19 16:07:22 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. luckily for you i'm in ap us history, and i just studied this portion of history for the AP exam in a few weeks. well, jackson was significant in many ways. he was the first president not from Virginia and Massachusetts, and the first one with conservative principles. as for the actual election of 1828, jackson won for a few reasons: 1. The campaign was ruthless. Adams made some low-ball moves, such as insulting Jackson's wife, and some people felt that he was very corrupt by making the deal with Henry Clay. 2. Jackson was in favor of the Western pioneers, and Southern Plantation owners, which outnumbered the Northeastern factory urbanites that supported Q. Adams. 3. The people seemed to be fed up with the Federalists. John Quincy… [cont.]
Answered by Billium - Sun Apr 19 16:20:27 2009
Q. I need to know how the democratic party affected the election of 1828 (Andrew Jackson).
Asked by funkykitty116 - Sun Apr 19 16:07:22 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. luckily for you i'm in ap us history, and i just studied this portion of history for the AP exam in a few weeks. well, jackson was significant in many ways. he was the first president not from Virginia and Massachusetts, and the first one with conservative principles. as for the actual election of 1828, jackson won for a few reasons: 1. The campaign was ruthless. Adams made some low-ball moves, such as insulting Jackson's wife, and some people felt that he was very corrupt by making the deal with Henry Clay. 2. Jackson was in favor of the Western pioneers, and Southern Plantation owners, which outnumbered the Northeastern factory urbanites that supported Q. Adams. 3. The people seemed to be fed up with the Federalists. John Quincy… [cont.]
Answered by Billium - Sun Apr 19 16:20:27 2009
What is the difference between the democratic party and the republican party?
Q. I'm writing an essay and I need to know the difference between the democratic party and the republican party. I know there are more interesting parties out there but I really need to know the difference between these 2.
Asked by questionable writer - Wed May 20 16:20:07 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
A. one is a JACKASS and the other is a LARDASS.
Answered by rob s - Wed May 20 17:20:46 2009
Q. I'm writing an essay and I need to know the difference between the democratic party and the republican party. I know there are more interesting parties out there but I really need to know the difference between these 2.
Asked by questionable writer - Wed May 20 16:20:07 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
A. one is a JACKASS and the other is a LARDASS.
Answered by rob s - Wed May 20 17:20:46 2009
Who was the idiotic leader of the democratic party that sent a letter?
Q. Who was the idiotic leader of the democratic party that sent a letter to former? President of France, Jacques Chirac citing his willingness to collaborate towards peace in the next four year. Shouldn't he have sent the letter to current President Sarkozy?
Asked by Happy Pappy - Tue Mar 24 09:12:04 2009 - - 13 Answers - 0 Comments
A. an idiot democrat? man, you need to narrow that down.
Answered by William H - Tue Mar 24 09:17:03 2009
Q. Who was the idiotic leader of the democratic party that sent a letter to former? President of France, Jacques Chirac citing his willingness to collaborate towards peace in the next four year. Shouldn't he have sent the letter to current President Sarkozy?
Asked by Happy Pappy - Tue Mar 24 09:12:04 2009 - - 13 Answers - 0 Comments
A. an idiot democrat? man, you need to narrow that down.
Answered by William H - Tue Mar 24 09:17:03 2009
What is happening to the Democratic party in 2009?
Q. There are "pay to play" scandals and questions about the selections of the incoming president. Members of the Democratic party seem to be angry and frustrated with others within their party. What is going on?
Asked by Cooper - Wed Jan 7 06:36:11 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Happens to every party in control of the power! You ain't see nothing yet, no you ain't seen nothing yet! Wait till Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have a set check. See who's got the biggest set. I guarantee they will have problems because each and every one of them think they are in control of the government!
Answered by unknown - Wed Jan 7 06:47:35 2009
Q. There are "pay to play" scandals and questions about the selections of the incoming president. Members of the Democratic party seem to be angry and frustrated with others within their party. What is going on?
Asked by Cooper - Wed Jan 7 06:36:11 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Happens to every party in control of the power! You ain't see nothing yet, no you ain't seen nothing yet! Wait till Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have a set check. See who's got the biggest set. I guarantee they will have problems because each and every one of them think they are in control of the government!
Answered by unknown - Wed Jan 7 06:47:35 2009
Why is it only the democratic party does this?
Q. I'm a mailhandler and every day I see millions of letters and parcels, and the past 6 years I've noticed something. Only the democratic party send mail telling people when election day is, when the ballots are open, and a phone number to call for a ride if the person needs help getting to the ballot. Maybe they're only mailing to registered democrats, there's no way for me to know for sure. But that's no guarantee the person will vote democratic. But I've never in 6 years seen similar mail from the republican party. Why doesn't the republican party do this?
Asked by Bob M - Thu Oct 30 14:14:36 2008 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Because the republican party doesn't need to...
Answered by hammer - Thu Oct 30 14:17:50 2008
Q. I'm a mailhandler and every day I see millions of letters and parcels, and the past 6 years I've noticed something. Only the democratic party send mail telling people when election day is, when the ballots are open, and a phone number to call for a ride if the person needs help getting to the ballot. Maybe they're only mailing to registered democrats, there's no way for me to know for sure. But that's no guarantee the person will vote democratic. But I've never in 6 years seen similar mail from the republican party. Why doesn't the republican party do this?
Asked by Bob M - Thu Oct 30 14:14:36 2008 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Because the republican party doesn't need to...
Answered by hammer - Thu Oct 30 14:17:50 2008
Can the democratic party honestly not see what's happening or are they working for the mob?
Q. I mean, think about the connections. Unions and teamsters are big time mob controlled, and also very democratic. Then conviniently all these laws are getting passed banning smoking, drinking, and harmless drugs. Now all these drugs are getting purchased by the mob, much like a prohibition. Does the democratic party not realize that they are indirectly funding organized crime or does organized crime run the democratic party? By the way, the reason I'm pointing out the democratic party is it is the party banning all of this and they own the unions which are really run behind the scenes by the mob.
Asked by -Inactive- - Thu Jun 12 19:20:39 2008 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The DNC has a long history of Mob involvement.
Answered by Put_waste_in_its_place - Thu Jun 12 19:24:29 2008
Q. I mean, think about the connections. Unions and teamsters are big time mob controlled, and also very democratic. Then conviniently all these laws are getting passed banning smoking, drinking, and harmless drugs. Now all these drugs are getting purchased by the mob, much like a prohibition. Does the democratic party not realize that they are indirectly funding organized crime or does organized crime run the democratic party? By the way, the reason I'm pointing out the democratic party is it is the party banning all of this and they own the unions which are really run behind the scenes by the mob.
Asked by -Inactive- - Thu Jun 12 19:20:39 2008 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The DNC has a long history of Mob involvement.
Answered by Put_waste_in_its_place - Thu Jun 12 19:24:29 2008
What has happened to my beloved Democratic Party?
Q. Why has the Democratic Party gone so far left? What happened to the party of FDR, Truman, JFK, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry? Why has the Democratic party gone so far left into communism under Barack Hussein Obama? I am no longer a Democrat!
Asked by dave G.C. - Wed Aug 27 20:32:46 2008 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hillary Clinton happened. Her pride, ego, arrogance and demons have ruined the party. I'll never be a Democrat again.
Answered by darrin b - Wed Aug 27 20:41:49 2008
Q. Why has the Democratic Party gone so far left? What happened to the party of FDR, Truman, JFK, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry? Why has the Democratic party gone so far left into communism under Barack Hussein Obama? I am no longer a Democrat!
Asked by dave G.C. - Wed Aug 27 20:32:46 2008 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hillary Clinton happened. Her pride, ego, arrogance and demons have ruined the party. I'll never be a Democrat again.
Answered by darrin b - Wed Aug 27 20:41:49 2008
If the Democratic candidate was white, would the party win in a landslide victory ?
Q. Seems to me that the country is tired of the republican party but hesitant to vote in a black president. Do you think if a white person such as Al Gore would have ran, the democratic party would win in a landslide victory ? For everyone thinking I'm racist.. I'm part hispanic and black. The reason I bring this is up is that it seems odd that the year that the republicans and seem backed in to a corner, the two weakest (in popularity) types of candidates were chosen. A minority and a woman.
Asked by mingblack - Thu Jul 17 10:56:50 2008 - - 17 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If people vote for the President based solely on race than what does that say about this country? Gore is as big as a moron as Obama. Obama has no strategy, he is nothing more than a smooth talking speech maker. Remember Obama is half white, so the half white candidate is not qualified as well.
Answered by Bob - Thu Jul 17 11:16:33 2008
Q. Seems to me that the country is tired of the republican party but hesitant to vote in a black president. Do you think if a white person such as Al Gore would have ran, the democratic party would win in a landslide victory ? For everyone thinking I'm racist.. I'm part hispanic and black. The reason I bring this is up is that it seems odd that the year that the republicans and seem backed in to a corner, the two weakest (in popularity) types of candidates were chosen. A minority and a woman.
Asked by mingblack - Thu Jul 17 10:56:50 2008 - - 17 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If people vote for the President based solely on race than what does that say about this country? Gore is as big as a moron as Obama. Obama has no strategy, he is nothing more than a smooth talking speech maker. Remember Obama is half white, so the half white candidate is not qualified as well.
Answered by Bob - Thu Jul 17 11:16:33 2008
Have there ever been any presidents who have destroyed the Democratic party?
Q. People tell me that George W. Bush destroyed the republican party when he was in office among other things. I don't know that Bush is the worst president we have had but he ranks way up there. However, I have been wondering who the worst democratic presidents in US history might have been and if there have ever been any democratic presidents who have done to the democratic party what Bush has done to the Republican party. Who might be the worst Democratic US president?
Asked by edwardfowler25 - Wed Mar 11 01:45:46 2009 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments
A. That would be Jimmy Carter. Truth is that both Carter and Bush had good intentions, but both failed. Some people argue that we should lower taxes all the time. That is a very bad idea, as evidenced by Bush's years in office. His refusal to raise taxes meant that he could not pay for what he did (specifically the Iraq and Afghanistan wars), and he wound up having to borrow the money at extremely high (and exponentially growing) interest rates. That sent the National Debt through the roof (he started his terms in office at $4 trillion, left the office when we had nearly $11 trillion in debt), which in turn devalued the dollar and collapsed the economy. Jimmy Carter raising taxes through the roof were just as bad, however. He took… [cont.]
Answered by I Freak Me Right the F*ck Out! - Wed Mar 11 01:51:57 2009
Q. People tell me that George W. Bush destroyed the republican party when he was in office among other things. I don't know that Bush is the worst president we have had but he ranks way up there. However, I have been wondering who the worst democratic presidents in US history might have been and if there have ever been any democratic presidents who have done to the democratic party what Bush has done to the Republican party. Who might be the worst Democratic US president?
Asked by edwardfowler25 - Wed Mar 11 01:45:46 2009 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments
A. That would be Jimmy Carter. Truth is that both Carter and Bush had good intentions, but both failed. Some people argue that we should lower taxes all the time. That is a very bad idea, as evidenced by Bush's years in office. His refusal to raise taxes meant that he could not pay for what he did (specifically the Iraq and Afghanistan wars), and he wound up having to borrow the money at extremely high (and exponentially growing) interest rates. That sent the National Debt through the roof (he started his terms in office at $4 trillion, left the office when we had nearly $11 trillion in debt), which in turn devalued the dollar and collapsed the economy. Jimmy Carter raising taxes through the roof were just as bad, however. He took… [cont.]
Answered by I Freak Me Right the F*ck Out! - Wed Mar 11 01:51:57 2009
Why am I considering leaving the Democratic Party for good?
Q. Am I the only one that feels that this primary race is doing too much damage to the party? Am I the only one that feels that Hillary is willingly ushering her supporters to McCain? Am I the only one that feels that this will/can do unprecedented damage to the Democratic Party and to the confidence of Democrats everywhere in the voting process? Your opinion?
Asked by Ghost Semp - Sat Mar 29 18:29:01 2008 - - 28 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Semper, it may surprise you to learn that I used to be a democrat until my fellow Texan, LBJ, introduced his "Great Society" in the 60s. I had voted for the guy. For me, the democratic party has never been the same because he introduced overt liberalism at the highest level and it has continued to evolve to the point that even God is under attack by that faction of your party. The "Great Society" took initiative away from those who otherwise would have been honest, hard working people. Once in the clasp of welfare, self respect gone, these same people became the core of the immoral drug culture cancer of this nation - and it was all one giant ploy to get the vote of the poor and underprivileged for LBJ once said, "We can't pay people… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Sat Mar 29 20:36:18 2008
Q. Am I the only one that feels that this primary race is doing too much damage to the party? Am I the only one that feels that Hillary is willingly ushering her supporters to McCain? Am I the only one that feels that this will/can do unprecedented damage to the Democratic Party and to the confidence of Democrats everywhere in the voting process? Your opinion?
Asked by Ghost Semp - Sat Mar 29 18:29:01 2008 - - 28 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Semper, it may surprise you to learn that I used to be a democrat until my fellow Texan, LBJ, introduced his "Great Society" in the 60s. I had voted for the guy. For me, the democratic party has never been the same because he introduced overt liberalism at the highest level and it has continued to evolve to the point that even God is under attack by that faction of your party. The "Great Society" took initiative away from those who otherwise would have been honest, hard working people. Once in the clasp of welfare, self respect gone, these same people became the core of the immoral drug culture cancer of this nation - and it was all one giant ploy to get the vote of the poor and underprivileged for LBJ once said, "We can't pay people… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Sat Mar 29 20:36:18 2008
How can the Democratic party be united if Obama doesnt choose Hillary as the VP?
Q. Sad how both the Democratic party and the media treated Hillary Clinton. The Democrats need to support women, and hopefully Obama chooses Hillary as VP. This will create a Democratic Dream Team.
Asked by Kyle - Tue Jul 29 09:02:25 2008 - - 19 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Obama CANNOT choose Hillary. People are having a hard enough time with Obama that if he chose Hillary as VP, many will say "everything I hate about the democrats in one convenient package!" and they go down to defeat
Answered by Stephen K - Tue Jul 29 09:21:34 2008
Q. Sad how both the Democratic party and the media treated Hillary Clinton. The Democrats need to support women, and hopefully Obama chooses Hillary as VP. This will create a Democratic Dream Team.
Asked by Kyle - Tue Jul 29 09:02:25 2008 - - 19 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Obama CANNOT choose Hillary. People are having a hard enough time with Obama that if he chose Hillary as VP, many will say "everything I hate about the democrats in one convenient package!" and they go down to defeat
Answered by Stephen K - Tue Jul 29 09:21:34 2008
Is Obama a socialist or is just the entire democratic party?
Q. Can someone tell me the big difference between what Obama and the rest of the democratic party advocates for? I have yet to find any so far with the exception of centrist Bill Clintion and his wife (Yuck! I can't believe I just said that). Can someone tell me how Obama's policies are different than the rest of the democrats?
Asked by ComeeeeBama - Tue Oct 21 19:32:29 2008 - - 12 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Have you ever noticed that when liberals are losing an argument, they will often resort to calling their opponent "fascist" or "nazi?" Same goes for conservatives - whenever they start losing, they ll fall back on the old standby of calling their opponent "socialist" or "communist." McCain is truly getting desperate. The fact is, he used to support the EXACT same type of tax plan that he is NOW calling socialism. Check out the video: And by the way what about Palin taking the windfall profits TAX from the oil companies and cutting a check to every Alaskan with it? If that's not "Spreading the wealth," I don't know what is. The McCain campaign is going down swinging, but make no mistake - they are going down.
Answered by El Guapo - Fri Oct 24 15:02:55 2008
Q. Can someone tell me the big difference between what Obama and the rest of the democratic party advocates for? I have yet to find any so far with the exception of centrist Bill Clintion and his wife (Yuck! I can't believe I just said that). Can someone tell me how Obama's policies are different than the rest of the democrats?
Asked by ComeeeeBama - Tue Oct 21 19:32:29 2008 - - 12 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Have you ever noticed that when liberals are losing an argument, they will often resort to calling their opponent "fascist" or "nazi?" Same goes for conservatives - whenever they start losing, they ll fall back on the old standby of calling their opponent "socialist" or "communist." McCain is truly getting desperate. The fact is, he used to support the EXACT same type of tax plan that he is NOW calling socialism. Check out the video: And by the way what about Palin taking the windfall profits TAX from the oil companies and cutting a check to every Alaskan with it? If that's not "Spreading the wealth," I don't know what is. The McCain campaign is going down swinging, but make no mistake - they are going down.
Answered by El Guapo - Fri Oct 24 15:02:55 2008
How will it be in Congress now that the Democratic Party has majority of the seats? what does it mean?
Q. I am just wondering since majority of democrats have the seats in Congress does that mean more assistance will be given to the middle and lower class? Will more bills or laws that goes through congress be approved since the democratic party is now power? Is there a way for the republicans to still win in congress? Kinda confused. Thanks.
Asked by I do not know - Sun Nov 9 12:29:35 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A lot will depend on each congress persons district they are elected from. For example Nancy Pelosi is in a liberal district, so she can support liberal agenda. Some Dems are in more moderate or even conservative districts, so even though they personally might oppose or support something, they can't vote that way if their constituents don't want it. There are also a lot of what they call "blue dog" Democrats. Those are much more conservative Democrats. President Elect Obama is probably farther to the left, than the average American. However like President Clinton, he will have govern, pass or veto bills, more from a centrist position, because most Americans are center or right of center.
Answered by gosam777 - Sun Nov 9 19:08:40 2008
Q. I am just wondering since majority of democrats have the seats in Congress does that mean more assistance will be given to the middle and lower class? Will more bills or laws that goes through congress be approved since the democratic party is now power? Is there a way for the republicans to still win in congress? Kinda confused. Thanks.
Asked by I do not know - Sun Nov 9 12:29:35 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A lot will depend on each congress persons district they are elected from. For example Nancy Pelosi is in a liberal district, so she can support liberal agenda. Some Dems are in more moderate or even conservative districts, so even though they personally might oppose or support something, they can't vote that way if their constituents don't want it. There are also a lot of what they call "blue dog" Democrats. Those are much more conservative Democrats. President Elect Obama is probably farther to the left, than the average American. However like President Clinton, he will have govern, pass or veto bills, more from a centrist position, because most Americans are center or right of center.
Answered by gosam777 - Sun Nov 9 19:08:40 2008
What is the rift between the democratic party?
Q. Okay well i'm a teenager and well unforunately I haven't been keeping up with the debates. I do belong to a democratic family. Sometimes I listen in on certain debates and what not, I listened in enough to know that the Democratic party was kinda being devided when Obama & Hillary were running agianst eachother. My question is why was it divided & what attempts have been made in order to help solve it? thanks. =)
Asked by ohhsnapitzjade - Sat Aug 30 00:14:22 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The Democrats are comprised of several interest groups with little in common other than abortion, socialism, and the common Republican enemy. For example, feminists aren't necessarily union members, and minorities aren't usually trial lawyers or actors. These "rifts" are nothing new. They're just struggles by various special interest groups to get a bigger piece of the pie for themselves. As for Obama and Clinton, both of them want power and don't mind going to the mat to get it. Politics ain't beanbag.
Answered by Curtis Strangelove III - Sat Aug 30 08:45:20 2008
Q. Okay well i'm a teenager and well unforunately I haven't been keeping up with the debates. I do belong to a democratic family. Sometimes I listen in on certain debates and what not, I listened in enough to know that the Democratic party was kinda being devided when Obama & Hillary were running agianst eachother. My question is why was it divided & what attempts have been made in order to help solve it? thanks. =)
Asked by ohhsnapitzjade - Sat Aug 30 00:14:22 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The Democrats are comprised of several interest groups with little in common other than abortion, socialism, and the common Republican enemy. For example, feminists aren't necessarily union members, and minorities aren't usually trial lawyers or actors. These "rifts" are nothing new. They're just struggles by various special interest groups to get a bigger piece of the pie for themselves. As for Obama and Clinton, both of them want power and don't mind going to the mat to get it. Politics ain't beanbag.
Answered by Curtis Strangelove III - Sat Aug 30 08:45:20 2008
How does a Christian democratic political party like the UMP gain power in an atheist country like France?
Q. In case you didn't know, the current president of France is a member of the UMP, a Christian democratic party.
Asked by DONNIE DOWNER - Wed Aug 5 23:25:17 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. In case you didn't know, the current president of France is a member of the UMP, a Christian democratic party.
Asked by DONNIE DOWNER - Wed Aug 5 23:25:17 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
what is a delegate and what is their primary role in the democratic party?
Q. I somewhat understand, but when it comes to the democratic party, I am trying to understand what a delegate really does.
Asked by mommys - Wed Aug 27 16:16:12 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. they just collect the money which they loss in election
Answered by aap_ki_komal - Wed Aug 27 16:33:08 2008
Q. I somewhat understand, but when it comes to the democratic party, I am trying to understand what a delegate really does.
Asked by mommys - Wed Aug 27 16:16:12 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. they just collect the money which they loss in election
Answered by aap_ki_komal - Wed Aug 27 16:33:08 2008
Why on Earth would the Republican party change its views to be more like the Democratic party?
Q. Wouldn't it be easier to just join the Democratic party & all work together to ruin the United States of America?
Asked by Invisible - Sun May 24 22:45:14 2009 - - 21 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, if the Republican party tows the same line they are doomed. I find this to be a tragedy, as our country does in fact need a conservative party.
Answered by Borat - Sun May 24 22:50:00 2009
Q. Wouldn't it be easier to just join the Democratic party & all work together to ruin the United States of America?
Asked by Invisible - Sun May 24 22:45:14 2009 - - 21 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, if the Republican party tows the same line they are doomed. I find this to be a tragedy, as our country does in fact need a conservative party.
Answered by Borat - Sun May 24 22:50:00 2009
Is Obama really different from the rest of the democratic party?
Q. We know he is a socialist but how is he different from the rest of the democratic party?
Asked by ComeeeeBama - Fri Oct 24 17:54:58 2008 - - 23 Answers - 0 Comments
A. He's not. In fact the only difference between any Democratic Politician and any Republican Politician are the lies they're telling. Other than that they're both beholden to the Corporate Oligarchy.
Answered by breetai - Fri Oct 24 17:58:16 2008
Q. We know he is a socialist but how is he different from the rest of the democratic party?
Asked by ComeeeeBama - Fri Oct 24 17:54:58 2008 - - 23 Answers - 0 Comments
A. He's not. In fact the only difference between any Democratic Politician and any Republican Politician are the lies they're telling. Other than that they're both beholden to the Corporate Oligarchy.
Answered by breetai - Fri Oct 24 17:58:16 2008
Should Democratic Party remove Independent/Republican votes to determine nominee?
Q. Since this is the selection process to determine the Democratic Party's presidential nominee, why are Independents and Republican votes allowed to sway the outcome. If these voters feel so strongly to have a voice in this party's nomination, then they should have registered as Democrats.
Asked by VoteForHillary - Mon Feb 18 20:18:57 2008 - - 15 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Let the Independents vote, but not the Republicans. Why let the other party potentially select your candidate??
Answered by yoyoda - Mon Feb 18 20:23:02 2008
Q. Since this is the selection process to determine the Democratic Party's presidential nominee, why are Independents and Republican votes allowed to sway the outcome. If these voters feel so strongly to have a voice in this party's nomination, then they should have registered as Democrats.
Asked by VoteForHillary - Mon Feb 18 20:18:57 2008 - - 15 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Let the Independents vote, but not the Republicans. Why let the other party potentially select your candidate??
Answered by yoyoda - Mon Feb 18 20:23:02 2008
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'democratic party'
Mon Aug 10 08:21:04 2009 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
news.google.com
Philadelphia Inquirer
A coalition of his Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan won The election of Barzani, 62, comes as Kurds are at loggerheads with ...
Barzani reelected in Kurdish election Al-Bawaba
In Kurdistan, Ruling Parties Retain Power but Opposition Gains Antiwar.com
World Politics Bugle-Observer
CCTV - United Press International (subscription) - Deutsche Welle
all 30 news articles »
smashingapps.com
326px x 500px | 64.40kB
[source page]
The Democratic Party and the 1984 Campaign png New Democratic Party Logo jpg democratic party2 ss jpg the democratic party jpg 2008 feb14 democratic party jpg 2008 jan24 democratic party jpg 1025 hong kong democratic party members rally jpg
moelane.com
unknown
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:50:40 GM
There are at least two Republicans on the list; but the Hudson County . Democratic Party. organizational chart is probably going to end up looking like there was a sudden outbreak of the bubonic plague. There is currently no indication ...
[Hide]▲
